Ex-FISA Judge Proposes a Better Surveillance Court

Thursday, July 25, 2013

us capitol surveillance cameras security (from satanoid on flickr/flickr)

The revelations of NSA mass surveillance projects by Edward Snowden last month, which were authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, raised the question of legitimacy for this secret court that oversees intelligence activities.

FISA—or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act—created the court in 1978 to oversee requests for surveillance warrants against suspected foreign intelligence agents located within the US.

Controversy has surrounded the court since Snowden’s revelations. Some have argued that the court is too subservient to the government, which explains why they authorize so many of the government’s requests for surveillance.

A former FISA court judge disagrees. And he also has his own solution for improving the court.

James Carr is currently a senior federal Judge for the northern district of Ohio. He served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court from 2002 to 2008 and joins The Takeaway to discuss the history of the FISA court and possible solutions to make it work better.

Stay up to date with The Takeawaybecome a Facebook fan & follow us on Twitter!

Guests:

James Carr

Produced by:

Tyler Adams

Editors:

T.J. Raphael

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.