Over 1,600 Gun-Related Deaths Since Newtown

Thursday, February 07, 2013

gun guns (Chang Liu/flickr)

Every few months, the media reports on a shooting so tragic that it causes the nation to pause. Last year, shootings in Aurora, Colorado and Oak Creek, Wisconsin became horrific preludes to the mass shooting carried out in Newtown, Connecticut.

But these shootings, while tragic in scope and scale, are not isolated events.

Take the map below, for example. The red dots represent adults killed by guns, the yellow dots represent teenagers, and the blue dots represent children. The data was pulled from Slate, which is available here. You can see a fullscreen version of our map here.

Shootings happen every day in America, but most are never covered by the national media. There is also no central database where the number of deaths by guns is recorded or collected. In response, and as the nation debates gun control, Slate is attempting to collect data on every person killed by a firearm. Through media reports, individual tips and in collaboration with the Twitter feed @GunDeaths, they are assembling the names, ages and gender of the victims, along with the location on the incident. 

As of Wednesday afternoon, Slate recorded more than 1,600 deaths in just the few weeks since the Newtown shooting. 

Dan Kois is a senior editor at Slate and a contributing writer to The New York Times Magazine. He's working on the gun map interactive for Slate and discusses why he believes this data is crucial.


Dan Kois

Produced by:

Arwa Gunja

Comments [3]

Chuck from Washington

The government is buying millions of ammunition rounds designed to kill civilians. They are buying automatic weapons for every government agency from the agricultural service to the local police. Police are buying fully armored vehicles designed for war zones. Now look at how many shooting incidents starting with Newtown where there is no living perpetrator to question. This is very clearly a ploy by the government to get your guns while they arm every one of their people. Only a total liberal fool could not see what is happening. This government is coming for you and the first step is to disarm you.

Jun. 10 2014 06:38 PM
Johnk24a from Fairfax, VA

Being unable to stop something does not mean you condone it. There were homicides before there were firearms. Were those homicides "condoned?"

Even the Dalai Lama said, "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." It's hard to shoot back without a gun.

Those who disarm the victims bear more responsibility than those that would permit the victims to defend themselves.

To paraphrase Seneca, "A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand."

John Lott estimates that firearms are used defensively about 2 million times a year in the US. How many crimes were prevented by the use of firearms in the last 8 weeks? How many lives were saved?

Feb. 13 2013 10:16 AM
Mimi Taufer from NYC

Our nation's inaction shows that our society condones homicide. Those who lobby against and vote against extensive gun control are guilty of homicide.

Feb. 07 2013 09:35 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.