Political Advertising Breaks Records

Friday, October 26, 2012

President Barack Obama walks away from Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney after the Presidential Debate at the University of Denver on October 3, 2012. (Getty)

If you're a voter in Ohio, Colorado, or Virginia, it probably won't surprise you to learn that a recent study by the Wesleyan Media Project found that 2012 has been a record-breaking year for political advertising. Swing states have been inundated with a barrage of campaign ads from candidates and causes alike, as Ohio voter Andy Schuster explains. Schuster says the amount of money being thrown at swing states in this election is "shocking." And though $1,000 is being spent per undecided voter, "I've never heard anyone say that it would have affected how they were voting," he says.

Michael Franz, co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project and professor at Bowdoin College, discusses the astronomical amount of money devoted to advertising by both Governor Romney and President Obama, and whether this makes a difference in key swing states. Democrats have increased their ad spending by 438 percent since 2008, while Republicans have upped their ad spending by 954 percent.  

"This is the most expensive presidential election in American history," Franz says. "So I think that sort of exacerbation is to be expected, given the number of ads that are being thrown at voters." 

"Both candidates have opted out of the general election public funding system, which frees them to raise as much money as they can, and the super PAC phenomenon, after the Citizens United case, has allowed outside money to flood the system."  

And the target is not just undecided voters. Much of what ads aim to accomplish is actually reassuring the base. "Obama knows quite well that there are scores of voters across the country who were enthusiastic about him in 2008, but who are on the fence about him in 2012," Franz says. So part of the goal is to make sure those voters remember why they supported the president in the first place.

"The ads sort of provide a little bit of a boost at the beginning, they remind people of the stakes, they remind people who's running and what issues are being debated," Franz says. "But then after that, ads are a little bit about keeping you high, so to speak. If the ads went away, that high would disappear, so the ads are about keeping you at a particular level, until you actually walk into the ballot box."  

Guests:

Michael Franz and Andy Schuster

Produced by:

Maggie Penman and Jillian Weinberger

Comments [2]

Larry Fisher from Brooklyn, N.Y.

Here's a question for the listeners:How much money would it take for a candidate to buy your vote?. Would you vote for Obama or Romney for a hundred bucks, a thousand bucks, ten thousand? What is your number?

The Ads are great for revenue for television stations and Advertising folks...Hey, they need a couple of billion dollars to keep going...

It's not super pac...it's super size pac...

Oct. 26 2012 01:43 PM
Jonah from Ny

Retarted means held back ad in flame retardant! The mean people are the people connecting this to people with disabilities!

Oct. 26 2012 09:48 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.