Supreme Court Rules Against GPS Tracking

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

On Monday the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that police violated the 4th amendment when they placed a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a suspect’s car and monitored its movements for 28 days. In his opinion on the case, Justice Anthony Scalia wrote that the use of GPS constituted a "search" and therefore requires a warrant. This ruling may have an impact on other cases where GPS was used, as well as other types of surveillance mechanisms.

Jeffrey Rosen is a professor of law at George Washington University.  Attorney Marc Rotenberg is director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, or EPIC.


Jeffrey Rosen and Marc Rotenberg

Produced by:

Shia Levitt

Comments [1]

BillV from Boston

The warrant element of this story is under-noted in the show. I get the feeling that I'm getting the People Magazine version of this story. It's kinda right but just doesn't get the whole story. The mention of what this means in a digital world is plain wrong when you include the fact that the case just says the police have to get a warrant. They can still track you. They just have to play by the existing rules.

Jan. 24 2012 09:41 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.