Falling Down the Corporate Ladder

Monday, April 05, 2010 - 07:49 PM

With top management jobs slashed across industries, more and more people are faced with the reality of having to take a step or two down the corporate ladder: Some are stepping off all together, rolling up their sleeves and taking “survival jobs” to make ends meet. Being thrown off the executive pedestal can pose some difficult challenges, but it doesn’t have to mean the end of the world. In fact, just like we’ve seen in the hit reality series Undercover Boss, there’s sometimes a lot to be learned from stepping down into the ranks. Here are tips to help you adjust, and make the most of, the realities of underemployment:

  • When job-hunting, be prepared to deal with the resistance you may face from being overqualified.  Script out your response. Emphasize your ability to perform. Be honest.  “You may want to, for example, say ‘I have background and experience that will add depth to this position while I keep busy, contribute, and bring sustenance to my family,’” suggests New York City career coach Beth Ross. But avoid coming off like a know-it-all, and be appropriately humble.
  • Face any concerns about your commitment to the job head-on. If the person hiring expresses concern that you’ll leave as soon as the economy turns around, Ross suggests you admit that of course that’s a possibility, but stress your commitment to be loyal while you’re there, the quality of work you’ll provide, and that you see it as a new learning experience.
  • If you’re contemplating a job unrelated to your field, make the most of the situation. Try to find a position where you can learn a new skill and add to your marketability. Or consider one that relates to your interests or hobbies. Keep your skills relevant, even if it means volunteering some of your time.
  • Try to find a position that comes with some autonomy. A study conducted last year by a pair of researchers at Portland State University shows that some independence on the job helps those that feel overqualified experience more satisfaction with their position.
  • When trying to move back into your field or back up the ladder, be straightforward about your experience. Don’t omit any job from your resume.  Background checks can turn things up. Be positive about your experience, and highlight any transferable skills. Point out what you gained from the job, and be honest about why you took it. Explain that you may have been trying to make ends meet, but that doesn’t mean you’ve lost your aspirations or abilities.
  • In the meantime, look for the silver lining. This type of change may result in less stress and a more enjoyable lifestyle. In a recent Gallup study, 51% of the underemployed reported spending at least six hours socializing with family and friends over a one-day period, compared with 43% of the employed.

More in:

Comments [1]

paulyrulo from florida

On monday I was APPALLED over a piece that you aired regarding big financial banking institutions and who was to blame for their failure. You had an eminent professor of economics who stated that there is no way to affix blame to anyone in those institutions including the CEO and his pals on the top floors. This professor, despite all of his education is either a complete moron or is a shill for these big banks. I say this because anyone with the least bit of common sense understands that it is the leader of a company who sets the rules and standards of business conduct (and I dont mean dress codes).
He alone should be acutely aware of the financial situations his company is in and solely responsible for correcting any errors in course or judgment of his underlings. Todays CEO's are compensated beyond anyone's imagination and as such MUST take full responsibility for the happenings at their company. They cannot hide behind the veil of protection by saying "they were unaware of problems" etc etc. Their job is to do just that...monitor all happenings so that the company and its investors are secure with their investments and the public does not have to bail them out. In stating that the CEO bares no responsibility for failure the professor distorts the whole concept behind mangement hierarchy. He gives the CEO's a free pass to ignore the company workings while reaping fanatstic rewards. Shame on this professor and all others who buy this garbage of an argument.
By holding CEO's TOTALLY responsible for the company failure or success you ensure that the ship has a captain at the helm. And if failures occur then that captain MUST GO and be replaced by a CEO who takes his job seriously. In fact, if there is legal impropriety found they should also be prosecuted severely since their actions affect millions of people and billions of dollars. If it was a company you owned, wouldnt you want to know EVERYTHING that is happening that affects your business? Then why is it that today's CEOs can survive without that dedication and attitude. Once companies start operating this way, they will be able to hire CEO's who care about a company in the long term, not for the short term. This was the way it was before the 1970's and that's the model we need again.

Apr. 09 2010 10:42 AM
Vote this comment up Vote this comment down Score: 0/0

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.







URL

If you enter anything in this field your comment will be treated as spam
Location
* Denotes a required field