<?xml version='1.0'?>
<playlist version="1.0" xmlns="http://xspf.org/ns/0/">
  <title>Lethal autonomous systems: The ethics of programming robots for war</title>
  <info>http://www.thetakeaway.org/2008/nov/25/lethal-autonomous-robots-ethics-programming-robots-war/</info>
  <trackList>
    <track>
      <location>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/audio.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway112508i.mp3</location>
      <annotation>Lethal autonomous systems: The ethics of programming robots for war</annotation>
      <info>http://www.thetakeaway.org/2008/nov/25/lethal-autonomous-robots-ethics-programming-robots-war/</info>
      
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/dlright">true</meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/cmsid">7727</meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/model">segment</meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/description">Now that it's possible to program unmanned combat vehicles to make decisions about where (and who) to strike in war situations, new questions of ethics have risen: In which situations can we allow robots to make their own decisions? Can we program robots to follow the Geneva Conventions? There is a </meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/listImage">http://media.wnyc.org/media/photologue/photos/tt/cache/MQ-1-predator-unmanned-bagram-ab-afghanistan-UAV-usaf_26_square.jpg</meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/detailImage">http://media.wnyc.org/media/photologue/photos/tt/cache/MQ-1-predator-unmanned-bagram-ab-afghanistan-UAV-usaf_26_square.jpg</meta>
    </track>
  </trackList>
</playlist>
