<?xml version='1.0'?>
<playlist version="1.0" xmlns="http://xspf.org/ns/0/">
  <title>Court Case to Test Quadriplegia and Parental Fitness</title>
  <info>http://www.thetakeaway.org/2010/jan/04/determining-parental-fitness-disabled-parents/</info>
  <trackList>
    <track>
      <location>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/audio.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway010410e.mp3</location>
      <annotation>Court Case to Test Quadriplegia and Parental Fitness</annotation>
      <info>http://www.thetakeaway.org/2010/jan/04/determining-parental-fitness-disabled-parents/</info>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/dlright">true</meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/cmsid">6470</meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/model">segment</meta>
      <meta rel="http://www.wnyc.org/ns/xspf/description">A quadriplegic mother is at risk of losing her five-month-old son in a custody battle with the baby's father, who cites her quadriplegia as a reason to deny her custody. Should the courts be involved in such cases? If so, where does ADA regulation end and family law begin? Lisa Belkin introduces us </meta>
    </track>
  </trackList>
</playlist>
