Obama's C.I.A Nominee John O. Brennan Has "Personal Objections" to Torture

Though he staunchly defended the C.I.A.'s drone program

Friday, February 08, 2013

In the aftermath of September 11th, the Central Intelligence Agency has come under a lot of scrutiny. From Saddam Hussein's (nonexistent) weapons of mass destruction, to the use of waterboarding and other forms of torture, to black sites and secret prisons, the war on terror has certainly tested the agency's credibility. 

At his Senate confirmation hearing yesterday, John O. Brennan, President Obama's nominee for director of the C.I.A., addressed these issues, and tried to restore Americans' faith in the C.I.A. Brennan tried to distance himself from the agency's recent past, explaining that he told C.I.A. colleagues his "personal objections" to certain enhanced interrogation techniques, such as "waterboarding, nudity, and others," although he "did not try to stop because it was, you know, something that was being done in a different part of the agency under the authority of others, and it was something that was directed by the administration at the time."

While Brennan expressed his disapproval for torture, he staunchly defended the C.I.A.'s drone program. "I think there is a misperception on the part of some American people who believe that we take strikes to punish terrorists for past transgressions," he told the Senate Intelligence Committee. "Nothing could be further from the truth. We only take such actions as a last resort to save lives when there is no other alternative to taking an action that’s going to mitigate that threat."

Tim Weiner has covered the C.I.A. for Takeaway partner The New York Times, a role that led to his Pulitzer Prize-winning book, "Legacy of Ashes: The History of the C.I.A." He analyzes the Brennan hearings, and discusses the future of the Agency under Brennan.

Guests:

Tim Weiner

Produced by:

Jillian Weinberger

Comments [6]

Larry Fisher from Brooklyn, N.Y.

There are jobs I wouldn't want. Running the CIA is a job that sounds like a lose lose situation.

Feb. 08 2013 12:56 PM

As an Air America/CIA widow, I'm interested in the CIA. John & Tim, thanks for the best discussion thus far re: drones, waterboarding, & the future of the CIA.

Feb. 08 2013 12:23 PM
Jerrold Richards from KOPB

Yeah,well,I sympathize. I wouldn't want to be tortured by those CIA goons either.

Feb. 08 2013 11:54 AM
DLMC from Brooklyn

REALLY.

So rather than capture and "torture" it is more humanitarian to kill them without trial.

WHAT KIND OF BIZZARRO LIBERAL LOGIC IS THAT.

Feb. 08 2013 11:47 AM
Angel from Miami, FL

If you think there's large support FOR the ownership of assault weapons wait 'til American skies are filled with drones! Nothing says "government encroachment" like an unmanned aerial vehicle surveilling private property or, say, remotely attacking alledged or unconfirmed violent criminals. Spraying bullets at RC airplanes is a sport in Podunk towns everywhere.

It almost seems like lawyers for the government are specifically chosen for their ability to write the unconstitutional as acceptable legal procedure. And yet when confronted with defense attorneys for actual criminals our government's lawyers seem somewhat inept.

Feb. 08 2013 10:54 AM
listener

"In the aftermath of September 11th, the Central Intelligence Agency has come under a lot of scrutiny. From Saddam Hussein's (nonexistent) weapons of mass destruction, to the use of waterboarding and other forms of torture, to black sites and secret prisons, the war on terror has certainly tested the agency's credibility. "

Any interest in the political double standards evident in news this week and the "credibility" of the news media?
Speaking of "nonexistent," nothing on the troubling revelations from the Panetta/Dempsey hearing on Benghazi?

Feb. 08 2013 10:27 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.