Nicholas Kristof appears at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on January 30, 2010
(World Economic Forum from Cologny, Switzerland/Wikipedia Commons)
As anti-American demonstrations continue around the Middle East, and particularly in Cairo, this week has underscored the tension and uncertainty between Egypt and the United States in the wake of the Arab spring.
Nicholas Kristof, columnist for The New York Times, says that unfortunately protests of this kind might happen periodically in the Arab world, because of the perception that inflammatory anti-Muslim statements made by fringe groups in the United States are representative of a more pervasive attitude throughout the country. What Kristof finds more troubling than the demonstrations themselves is the response in Egypt of President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood.
"They blew it," Kristof says. "The Muslim Brotherhood, as you know, initially put out a message in Arabic encouraging people to go protest in front of the U.S. embassy, to defend Muhammad. And then, after the attack on the embassy, President Morsi went AWOL."
In Libya and Yemen, the tone immediately became apologetic after the attacks, but it was only after a "blunt phone call" from President Obama that Egypt's President Morsi came out to condemn the violence on the U.S. embassies.
Kristof posits that much of the tension between Egypt and the United States stems from another tension within Egypt itself. In many of these countries, Kristof says, there is a battle for public opinion between Islamic extremists who feel they've been marginalized since the revolution, and more moderate groups like the Muslim Brotherhood.
"Although the U.S. was obviously the nominal target in Egypt and in Libya, I think that, in some ways, the government itself was the target."
Perhaps the most tragic aspect of the events in the Middle East this week is how revealing they have been about the persistent lack of understanding between the United States and the Arab world. While of course the United States has had a role in suppressing Islamic people and groups in the past, "there's also a profound misunderstanding in many Islamic societies about how the U.S. works." Kristof explains that "even now, if you ask moderate people in many countries about this, they will on the one hand denounce the attacks on embassies; on the other, they will say, you know, its outrageous that the U.S. allows this kind of video to happen, and they will perceive some kind of hidden U.S. support for a video that they feel is extraordinarily offensive."
All of this, Kristof thinks, is going to continue to be a serious issue for U.S. relations with the Middle East, and particularly Egypt, in the years to come. "This kind of outrage, and violence, and the pandering to it that you saw from President Morsi, I think is a reflection of a much more difficult kind of diplomacy we're going to be engaging with in the region ahead."
Comments [4]
The radical Christian right and the radical Islamic right are allies. Each is playing off the other, trying to provoke a holy war via deliberate insult, overreaction, and murder. They're not trying to defeat each other -- at least not yet. Their shared goal is to force moderates everywhere to join one side or the other, increasing their power. They have a common enemy: us.
The US in the Middle East is very much like the US in Central America. Every president has always followed the United Fruit Doctrine when it comes to these nations. The sole reason for being there is to satisfy our corporate interests... and nothing more.
Reality check, folks. Take away the petroleum from that region (or discover fusion energy) and the vast conflict zone between Libya and Pakistan, including Israel, might as well be referred to as Greater Rwanda. Just another place who's troubles we can [mostly] ignore.
Arab Spring...beware the Fall Behind. It could be a long winter for Obama or Romney depending on how the Middle East plays out and how these Candidates respond to this strange game... Its like every player in the Middle East has brought their own stacked deck of cards and they are all playing different games: Libya, Syria, Iran, Egypt, Afghanistan. I missed a couple didn't I.
I'm out.
How is this possible? The world loves us for electing President Obama. Did you actually report that our relationship with Egypt has deteriorated under Obama.
Egyptians were chanting "Obama, Obama there are a billion Osamas". Hmm, under Bush when other countries demonstrated against the US it was due to Bush's policies. Odd how now there seems to be all kinds of nuance. The Obama doctrine of "leading from behind" is not even mentioned.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.