Does the GOP Need to Fix its Primary System?

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks to the media as a television ad plays behind him. (Joe Raedle/Getty)

Here's a question you may not have asked yourself: why does the Republican party hold primaries and caucuses at all? Is there a better system than the long, drawn out process of staggered elections which push and pull the political momentum towards different candidates at different points in the cycle? Wouldn't it be easier to have all of the states elect their nominee at once? Or is there another way entirely to choose our political leaders? 

Brown University political science professor James Morone argues that the Republican primary system is simply not working for the GOP the way that it worked for Democrats in 2008. In fact, the 2012 primary process may even be tearing the party apart.

Guests:

James Morone

Produced by:

Hsi-Chang Lin

Comments [1]

We_Hold_These_Truths

Don't worry, the GOP has fixed it's primary system. There are an ample number of party delegates help direct the nomination if there is no clear winner that they can't displace anyway.

Mar. 08 2012 06:26 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.