Photoshopping the Real Girl Out of the Girl

Friday, July 06, 2012

Seventeen Magazine Seventeen Magazine (Joe Shlabotnik/Peter Dutton/flickr)

This week, Seventeen magazine released their “Body Peace Treaty,” which promises to “celebrate every kind of beauty” and “never alter the shape of a girl’s face or body.” The treaty comes in the aftermath of an online petition, signed by nearly 100,000 girls, asking the magazine to “give girls images of real girls.”

The petition was started by 14-year-old Julia Bluhm. And now her friend, 16-year-old Carina Cruz, has started a similar petition, targeted at Teen Vogue. 

"This problem has always been very personal to me, this problem with body image. I've always struggled with it," Cruz says. "It's a universal problem, and I think that the media really doesn't help to fix that problem." Cruz believes that the practice of photoshopping is a major cause of feelings of inadequacy among young women. 

"There's obviously a connection between the insecurities that teen girls are feeling, and then looking at these magazines at the same time," Cruz says. Along with factors like personal insecurities and negative comments from peers, the media certainly doesn't help. 

Emily Rems, the managing editor of Bust Magazine, and her team have been recognized repeatedly for their efforts to celebrate girls of diverse backgrounds and body types. One of their biggest fans is Tina Fey, who famously wrote in her memoir, “Bossypants,” that no magazine has done a better job of leaving her looking beautiful and intact after a photoshoot.

"What we do know between the 1950s and now is that the amount of dissatisfaction that younger and younger girls feel about their bodies is astronomically higher now that it was then," Rems says. "One can't help but see a correlation." 

There is such a thing as "responsible photoshop", Rems says. The removal of something minor, like a blemish, would fall under this category. Then there are cases in which magazines alter the contours of models' bodies or faces.  

The problem does not just lie in magazines' altering of photographs, however. Rems places the blame on fashion designers themselves, who tend to only send sample clothes of smaller sizes to magazines for photoshoots. "When we're out there with our fashion editors trying to procure clothes for our magazine, and the fashion industry provides those clothes and says, 'No, we will not give you a sample above this size,' and it's that way across the board, that's how you end up with this homogenous view of fashion over and over and over again," Rems says. 

Cruz's petition can be found at www.change.org/teenvogue.

Guests:

Carina Cruz and Emily Rems

Produced by:

Robert Balint and Kristen Meinzer

Comments [5]

denise from Vancouver

I used to read Sassy as a teen in the '80s and even in that magazine, I never saw images of any chubby or plus-sized girls. A lot of people mention it and Jane as alternatives, but they never showed alternative images of beauty, really. I remember reading these magazines and feeling "not enough" just as a caller did when reading Seventeen. I don't want these magazines to be valourized for a surface-level attempt at being alternative.

Jul. 13 2012 11:00 AM
Sophia from New York

I live in New York City, and see models on a daily basis. News flash: models are both real and gorgeous. Publishing photos without airbrushing will not make models look more like you and me. The conversation seems to be confused: are they also asking the magazines to pledge using models of color and models of various weights?

Here's how to improve girls' priorities: encourage them to read something else. I rock my natural hair, I look good, I also have ambitions. I contract enough anxiety over my appearance out of the American ether; I don't need to waste my time reading the same articles month after month, year after year, convincing me, if not that my hair is extremely important, that my clothes are extremely important. This aspect of the conversation also seems confused: we say that these girls are being brave and that the magazines are just out for money. If they're just out for your money, and make you feel bad, don't buy them.

Jul. 13 2012 10:57 AM
James G. Latham from Hartsdale, NY

The Higgs mechanism does not miraculously create mass out of "nothing." Rather, the mass is transferred to the particle from the Higgs field, which contained this mass in the form of energy. Thus, the Higgs mechanism does not account for the origin of mass in the ultimate sense.

Jul. 06 2012 10:26 AM
Rao from Columbia, SC

Banning Photoshop is not a good idea. Now, my daughter is finally convinced that nobody could look that skinny AND healthy without using Photoshop. Now, I imagine magazines and models will work harder to achieve that unrealistic weight and it will be more difficult for me to convince my daughter that what she sees in the magazines is an illusion/fantasy/unreal.

Jul. 06 2012 09:51 AM
cookrl

No to the photoshop and fantasy images of women and girls in magazines.

Jul. 06 2012 09:25 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.