A photo of Syria's embattled President Bashar al-Assad lies on the ground next during a demonstration outside the Russian embassy in Beirut.
(ANWAR AMRO/Getty)
Over the weekend, Friends of Syria, an organization of 60 nations created to support the Syrian opposition, gathered in Istanbul for yet another meeting on the seemingly unending revolt against President Bashar al-Assad. Thirteen months of fighting have left over more than 9,000 dead, and recent mediation efforts led by United Nations special envoy Kofi Annan have failed to stop the violence.
Yet U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton still had a message of hope for the Syrian people: "The world will not waver," she announced to the Friends of Syria meeting on Sunday. "Assad must go and the Syrian people must be free to choose their own path forward." Indeed, the Istanbul meeting did conclude with real results: Arab nations promised $100 million to pay the Syrian opposition fighters and the United States promised communications equipment and another $12 million in humanitarian aid.
Is that enough to help the struggling opposition? Amr Al Azm, member of the Syrian opposition and professor of history and anthropology at Shawnee State University, explains.
Lessons From a Female Union Electrician
President Obama Seeks to Narrow 'War on Terror,' A Closer Look at the IRS Inquiry, Boy Scouts to Allow Gay Members
The DSM and Mental Health in America
Defining Normal After a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia, The Mayor of Oklahoma City, A New Kind of Commencement Speech
Oklahoma High School Seniors Graduate in Tornado's Aftermath
The show is a co-production of WNYC Radio and Public Radio International, in collaboration with New York Times Radio and WGBH Boston.
Major funding provided by:
Comments [1]
Remember when "regime change" was a dirty expression and exiles calling for the liberation of their nation were not to be trusted? Apparently we are all neo-cons now and we will have to wait for President Romney before the throngs of anti-war protesters materialize out of nowhere again.
Some in the media base their attitudes on expedient domestic politics and not international freedom.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.