The Implications of a Post-Gadhafi Libya

Monday, August 22, 2011

In the wake of last night's events in Tripoli, policy makers are eager to see how effectively the Libyan Transitional Council will respond to what might be the end of Moammar Gadhafi 42 year reign. With a lack of non-governmental organizations in the country and few structures in place to support the council and the rebel forces, the challenges ahead for the state are numerous. The most pressing matter being who will fill the power vacuum left open by Gadhafi's fall. Will NATO be asked to assist, or will the Libyan people direct their own government for the first time in over four decades?

As fighting continues in Tripoli, Ibrahim Sharqieh, director of the Brookings Doha Center, discusses the events from Qatar and how he sees the nation progressing in the near future.

Guests:

Ibrahim Sharqieh

Comments [1]

Nikos Retsos from Chicago, U.S.

I absolutely do NOT see any implication, nor any power vacuum, after Gadhafi's fall. This kind of talk has become typical rehash of political analysts that lack any better analysis or political opinion.

The Libyan rebels have lost hundreds of comrades in the 5 months of the fighting, but those losses have taught them good battlefield lessons that have turned them now into an effective and high morale fighting force. And their vision is a free Libya - not a fratricidal adventure.

Who could have imagined when the Egyptian uprising started against Hosni Mubarak that those explosive demonstrations would have spread the seeds of rebellion across the Arab world? Egypt has always been a pivotal state in the Arab world since its late leader Gamal Abdel Nasser inspired a high spirit of Arab nationalism across Arabia, but the spark of a revolution in Egypt that spew cinders across Arabia and lit the spirit of the Arabs to rise against their tyrants may be the the most important development of the 21st Century. And this may not have happened without the explosion of the Internet, the social networks, and the commonality of cell phones that helped people connect and mass for a common cause.

What we see now in the Arab world is the explosion of oppressed people seeking the equality that was denied to them by unscrupulous rulers and despots. Aristotle argued 2.300 years ago that “sedition [revolution] is always to be found in inequality,” and “the passion for equality is always the cause of sedition.” John F. Kennedy affirmed that view when he stated that “Those whom make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” Mubarak and Gadhafi thought that they had built a family dynasty that could withstand any revolt. But their regimes crumbled under the massive protests that spread like a tsunami and flattened their corrupt regimes and internal security institutions.

Now the Assad dynasty in Syria and the Saleh dynasty in Yemen are battered by waves of public discontent and they are expected to sink – unless their people attain equality too! And in the recent years the people of Kyrgyzstan had chased out of the country two despotic presidents, Askar Akayev and Kumanbek Bakiyev. The rest of the few despots still remaining around the world had better take notice. Nikos Retsos, retired professor

Aug. 22 2011 11:46 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.