Should Pharmaceutical Reps Have the Right to Doctors' Prescription Histories?

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

How do you define the right to free speech? Some would argue it means being allowed to say what you believe, even when it's not popular. Others would say it means getting a good look at what kind of prescriptions that your doctor has given you. At least, that's the argument being made in a Supreme Court case today, in which company IMS Health will make a case for allowing pharmaceutical companies to get a gander at just what kind of prescriptions you're picking up at the pharmacy for marketing purposes. 

Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Correspondent for our partner The New York Times says explains the free speech argument.

William Sorrell, State Attorney General for Vermont, who petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case also joins us to explain why he is fighting to restrict the pharmaceutical industry from accessing doctor records for the purposes of marketing to them.

Guests:

Adam Liptak and William Sorrell

Produced by:

Jen Poyant

Comments [1]

E.C.Bates from detroit mi

First, it's an invasion of the prescriber's privacy.
Second, it does drive up the cost of drugs because IMS and the participating pharmacies are not doing this for free. Third, it is a form of harassment because it targets specific physicians (mostly high prescribers) and these physicians are hounded by pharmaceutical representatives from competing companies.

Apr. 29 2011 10:28 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.