President Obama spoke to a crowd at the Cuyahoga Community College in Cleveland, Ohio, yesterday. He continued a week of painting the GOP as naysayers and describing his plan to address the ailing economy: tax cuts on those making less than $250,000 a year paid for by closing business tax loopholes, and tax write-offs for businesses' research and development efforts as well as investments in new equipment and jobs. Obama also described the U.S. as having done better under Clinton-era tax rates than those under President Bush's tax cuts.
There’s quite the political brawl going on over the economy at the moment, and the role tax cuts will play in it. But here at The Takeaway, we’ve been thinking. If we want to really understand more of the "dismal science" of economics, it would behoove us to tiptoe past the mudslinging rhetoric and pull out our pocket protectors. Louise Story is here with a calculator. She’s been digging into the math.
Comments [2]
I don't agree with your statement that "the rich wouldn't invest if they had higher taxes."
Why not give those businesses that create jobs generous tax breaks for five, ten, fifteen, or thirty years? That would put money into circulation at every level and still be extrememely attractive for new or expanded business.
I'm no fan of supply side (trickle down) economics, but my understanding was that the rich wouldn't invest if they had higher taxes. Investment would then lead to jobs for us poor folks. I don't think consumer spending has much to do with it.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.