In this economy, people know that every little bit counts when it comes to saving money. It is no different for the federal commission trying to reduce a $200 billion budget shortfall. They could save $14 billion dollars by 2015 if they cut the direct payments farmers receive under the 2008 Farm Bill — and if they eliminate the subsidy promises, in the event that prices for wheat, corn, soy and other commodities fall in the next few years. What effects would farmers and food shoppers see if these subsidies were to go away?
We are joined by Daryll E. Ray, director of the Agricultural Policy Center at the University of Tennessee.
Comments [3]
Big business farmers should have limited access to subsidies, let smaller farmers qualify by size of production. or jobs provided, etc.
I live in Kansas and every farmer complain about welfare for the poor, but sure do slop at the troff of farm subsidies
The richest recipients of farm subsidies (welfare) live on Park Ave. Rich "farmers" don't need the assistance. How about we pay the real price for food and energy?
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.