Ballot Designs Across the Country Ten Years After 'Hanging Chads'

Tuesday, November 02, 2010

Ballot Official 2008 absentee ballot for El Paso County, Colorado (Flickr: iceman9294)

Ballot design has been a hot button issue every election year since the controversial 2000 elections, which saw George W. Bush narrowly win the presidency. That year, many voters in Palm Beach, Florida said they voted for Al Gore, when in actuality their votes wound up counted for someone else, due to the confusing design of the butterfly ballots used there.

Now, ten years later, with the help of Jessica Friedman Hewitt, we'll look at the problems that still exist with today's ballots and how they can still be improved.

Guests:

Jessica Friedman Hewitt

Produced by:

David J Fazekas

Comments [1]

Konrad Kaletsch from Brooklyn, NY

I’m the oddball having never voted with a paper ballot so this mid-term election was an eye opener. I used to say, “What’s so hard about paper ballots?” Now I know.

I longingly cherish our NYC mechanical voting booths with their colored incandescent lights, threadbare curtains, creaky gears and cranky levers. They made a sound I’ll never forget – the sound of voting … democracy is noisy! I once brought my kids to vote and see these dinosaurs knowing that electronic voting was on the way. I wondered where the machines were stored and who brought them back to life each election (sounds like they were running out of people who knew how to keep these relics alive; they were old too). Seems like political agendas and technology have finally put these voting booths into the museum (and into the landfill).

So there I was with my first paper ballot. “Do you have a pen or pencil?” I asked. I got a grouchy no. First problem. “Could you tell me how to do this?” Another grouchy and unhelpful answer. Another problem (I figured it out and found a pen). The voting booth? Another case of one size fits all – standing use only. It was also clear from the design that considerations favored their storage and transportation, not the voter. For me that meant hunching over. Its walled sides, meant to offer privacy, blocked the light making it hard to see. Forget it; I grabbed a nearby table and sat.

The ballot itself was confusing and I am not easily confused. It was hard to tell if I was still voting for governor, or had moved into the senator section, or had voted for two governors. Why? Lots of candidates spilled into a second row, one that wasn’t clearly connected – it kinda floated. Your eyes couldn’t scan across, they had to jump back and forth assembling this puzzle. Font size was too small, maybe 10 point. Font was sans-serif (Helvitica?) which is preferred for reading on a screen, not the printed page. Lines used to create the letters were thin and too easily disappeared into the white of the page. The ballot was two sided with no clear indication that there was more voting on the flip side. Voting was a matter of coloring in a circle – pen only! Finally, there was no clear indication that my next step was to feed my paper ballot into an electronic reader. I solved all these problems – how did others fare?

Was universal design applied to NYC voting? Not very well (universal design is an approach to design that reduces the marginalization many experience by poor design). The best I can say, and I must appreciate an acquaintance for his dogged work, is that NY has moved into the electronic voting era with a hard copy of your vote; we are not electronic-only. Thank-you David!

http://www.universaldesignresource.com/

Nov. 04 2010 05:27 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.