We analyze the results of the Iraqi elections; discuss the effectiveness of sex offender laws in the wake of the rape and murder of Chelsea King; look ahead to this week's agenda; find out about a BBC experiment that disconnected people from the internet; learn why Baby Einstein videos don't work; talk all things Oscars the day after the ceremony; and kick off a new series about genius with author David Shenk. Miles O'Brien is in for John Hockenberry.
Millions of Iraqis went to polling stations on Sunday to vote in the nation's parliamentary elections. Sporadic violence was responsible for the deaths of at least 38 people, but early reports indicate the election was largely viewed as a success by the international community. President Obama called the vote a "milestone" on Sunday, but analysts and observers wonder if the election will trigger sectarian violence as it did following Iraq's 2005 elections.
In this week's agenda, Marcus Mabry, international business editor for the New York Times, and Jonathan Marcus, BBC diplomatic correspondent, look at what to expect this week. They'll look at the aftermath of Iraq's national elections, Vice President Biden's visit to the Middle East, and the latest news on financial reform.
Could you live without the internet for a whole week? No email. No Facebook. No TheTakeaway.org. If that thought fills you with horror then you'll feel for two families in South Korea—the “most wired” nation in the world, with the fastest broadband speeds and the highest percentage of its population online. As part of the BBC’s “Superpower” season, which is looking at how the Internet has changed the world, these two families were asked to cut themselves off from the Internet for a whole week.
You’ll be hearing a lot about the winners of last night’s glamorous Oscars, but you may not hear about its millions of losers. A dispute between Cablevision and ABC left more than three million New York area cable subscribers unable to see last night’s awards ceremony.
A lot of people set their children in front of the television to watch educational videos and programming — from "Sesame Street" to "Baby Einstein" — with the hope that these shows will help their children to learn. But a new study out last week in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, says these videos don’t actually make kids smarter, and may in fact impede their learning.
Chelsea King, a 17-year-old girl from San Diego, was raped and killed last month by John Gardner, a man with a history of sex crimes. Gardner was previously incarcerated for molesting a 13-year-old girl in 2000, but was let out of prison early in 2005. The case has sparked a heated national dialogue about the strength of laws intended to protect children from sex offenders. And the question of where sex offenders should live has come up in Florida, as offenders there struggle to adjust to society after prison sentences.
The film industry celebrated its largest gala at the 82nd Academy Awards Sunday night. The big news was that "The Hurt Locker" cleaned up, carrying home six Oscars, but there were plenty of other moments to talk about. Melena Ryzik, of the New York Times' Carpetbagger blog, and TV blogger Delaina Dixon, cover who won, who lost, and what's going to be the big topic of conversation around the water cooler today.
The votes are still being counted this morning after Iraq's national election yesterday, and results aren't expected until later this week. One of the key areas of voting in the country was the oil rich northern region of Kurdistan. Thanks to the area's oil reserves, the Kurds have exercised a significant amount of influence and power in Iraq's politics in recent years, often acting as a cohesive block. We're joined by Jim Muir, a BBC correspondent in Baghdad, who tells us more about the general election and the unique role Kurds are playing.
When you hear the word "genius," you might think of Einstein, Mozart, or Da Vinci. But how they became geniuses is the subject of debate. Where they born that way? Or does it come from sheer tenacity?
We begin a week-long conversation about genius and how any of us can get that way. David Shenk, author of "The Genius in All of Us: Why Everything You've Been Told about Genetics, Talent, and IQ is Wrong," tells us about some surprising research about what it takes to, as he puts it, "get good at stuff." Turns out it's not as hard as you might think.
Segment : [2F] SLUG: [GENIUS] [CH] leads
Guest: David Shenk, author of “The Genius in All of Us”.
Location: IN STUDIO
Please pay attention to the arc – it’s important that we hit on Mozart at the end. Also please note that there is a lot of audio pulled to pepper in over this series – a well of “geniuses on genius” to draw from.
ROLES (if they exist)
David Shenk will intro the ideas behind the book/the week - a debunking of “genius” as an inborn trait, in favor of the idea that high achievement comes from the interplay of genes and experience.
Betty Hart (prerecord) will support this claim with her research. She discovered that early intelligence is *highly* correlated with the number of words spoken in the home.
Jim Flynn (prerecord) will support this claim with his research. He discovered that, in the last century, the average worldwide IQs rose dramatically.
ARC
--straw man (genius is from god/genes)
--genes aren’t destiny - state thesis (genes x experience)
--intelligence can grow - support thesis (pre-record audio)
--practice is key - (Mozart)
--tomorrow, we’ll talk to a genius.
INTRO
TKTKTK [JAY COWIT] BRANDING SOUND FOR GENIUS HOUR
“MUX MUX MUX...”
We can all agree on who the geniuses are - Einstein, Mozart, Da Vinci, Edison. But where does that genius come from? Is it a gift from god? Is it in our genes? And - here's the question that's important to all of us - are only a select few chosen to excel, while the rest of us are doomed to mediocrity? Not so, says David Shenk. He’s the author of “The Genius in All of Us: Why Everything You’ve Been Told About Genetics, Talent and IQ is Wrong”. This week, all week long, David Shenk will join us in a conversation, here and on the website at thetakeaway.org, about how we can *all* tap into our own extraordinary abilities.
QUESTIONS
David, you don’t hear so much, anymore, about talent coming from God. But you do hear a lot about genes. When my child was born, people said, oh, he’s got your eyes, or your nose, and when he does something great, I’m tempted to say, oh, he got that from me. But your book seems to say that that idea isn’t *quite* right.
[yes, genes are nothing without expression – without experience.]
So, when people visit the sperm bank and choose a smart man… does that ensure they’re going to have a smart child?
[not really. There is no *smart*ness in genes. It’s a lot about how you help those genes be developed]
But it’s true that some kids just do better in school, right from the start. We recently talked to a researcher you mentioned in her book. Her name is Betty Hart, and she was trying to figure out what happened in the years before pre-school that made some students much better prepared.
GENIUS 1 HART OBSERVED – 11s
BETTY HART, PRE-RECORD, HOME IN KANSAS
“we observed for an hour a day and recorded all the talk that went on. some parents talked very little to the kids, some parents talked huge, huge amounts, as you can see from the numbers...”
David, what were those numbers, and why do they matter?
[it’s not about smart people inheriting smart genes, it’s about early exposure.]
So, just how smart can we get? David, in your book you speak to a researcher named Jim Flynn. We talked to him earlier about some work he did, comparing IQ scores over the last century – and here’s what he discovered.
GENIUS 2 FLYNN IQGROWTH – 22s
JIM FLYNN, PRE-RECORD, HOME IN NEW ZEALAND
“IQ gains were moving at about 3 points a decade. well, over a hundred years, that would be thirty points, wouldn't it? well, if our grandparents were 30 points below us, that would put them at 70. and 70 is the cutoff point for mental retardation. and that hardly seemed to make any sense..”
David, what does he mean by that?
[our brains are plastic, the parts we use get much bigger and better.]
So, if genius isn't something that's just *given*, what does it take to *attain* genius?
[well, not so much. Mozart got his gift from quite a lot of practice]
For more on this idea, visit our website where you can read an excerpt from the book. Or you can email us with questions, at TKTKTK. David will be answering those on the site.
Well, tomorrow we’ll talk to someone who really took that challenge to heart. We'll speak to Sarah Chang, a concert violinist who first picked up the violin at age 4.
AUDIO AVAILABLE (TOP BEST CUTS):
GENIUS 3 FLYNN DOGSRABBITS – 21s
JIM FLYNN, PRE-RECORD, HOME IN NEW ZEALAND
“and the solution that I hit on was that it's not so much that we're brighter than they are, but that we've put on scientific spectacles. you see if you asked a kid in 1900 what dogs and rabbits have in common, they'd say you use dogs to hunt rabbits. well that's the wrong answer. you're supposed to say they're both mammals.”
GENIUS 4 FLYNN SMARTER – 15s
JIM FLYNN, PRE-RECORD, HOME IN NEW ZEALAND
ASKED: SO HAVE WE GOTTEN SMARTER IN 100 years?
“if you mean are we exercising parts of our brain that we didn't exercise in 1900, for example the parts that deal with abstractions and logic, then probably under a microscope would look a little different.”
GENIUS 5 HART MESSAGE – 12s
BETTY HART, PRE-RECORD, HOME IN KANSAS
“it's an important message. that people realize that they can't count on capacity. they've got to do their part! tell the kids about things..”
FACTS (if any)
page #s
p 35-37 Jim Flynn’s study
p 37-39 Betty Hart’s study
p 50-51 Mozart story
ARTICLE (if any)