Imagine the ease of riding trains between metropolitan areas in the U.S. Simply buy a ticket, board a train, kick back and read, sleep, listen to your podcasts of The Takeaway. Doesn't that sound better than braving crowded airport drop-offs, hours-long security lines or snarled traffic on the interstate? This vision of the future of travel may become a reality. Yesterday, President Obama expressed his ambition towards building high-speed passenger rail lines in ten regions across the country. To discuss how this will be possible The Takeaway is joined by Matt Dellinger, a writer whose work has appeared in The New Yorker, The Atlantic, and the New York Times .
"It wasn't as if Eisenhower snapped his fingers and the interstates were built the next two years." —Writer Matt Dellinger on Obama's proposed rail system
Here's a brief look at how one town, Springfield, is planning on upgrading their infrastructure:
I love the convenience of the large rail network in Europe.
I think I read an article in the New Yorker several years ago comparing the regular train route between Washington DC and New York City and flying between the two and the result was that both took about the same amount of time because of the need to commute from the each city to the airport and back. The total time was about 4 hours. In fact the train time was about 3 minute shorter than the total airplane/taxi to airport mode of travel.
The ACELA line actually get a person from New York to Washington faster than flying does.
Until recently in lived in a state that passed a referndum to build a high speed maglev train from one side of the state to the other, between two major cities. It passed by a large margin, but the Governor used a little known part of the state constitions to overturn the result of the referendum
Apr. 17 2009 01:20 PM
Score: 0/0
Leave a Comment
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.
Supported By
The Takeaway is a national morning news program that invites listeners to be part of the American conversation. Hosts John Hockenberry and Celeste Headlee, along with partners The New York Times, BBC World Service, WNYC, Public Radio International and WGBH Boston, deliver news and analysis and help you prepare for the day ahead.
I love the convenience of the large rail network in Europe.
I think I read an article in the New Yorker several years ago comparing the regular train route between Washington DC and New York City and flying between the two and the result was that both took about the same amount of time because of the need to commute from the each city to the airport and back. The total time was about 4 hours. In fact the train time was about 3 minute shorter than the total airplane/taxi to airport mode of travel.
The ACELA line actually get a person from New York to Washington faster than flying does.
Until recently in lived in a state that passed a referndum to build a high speed maglev train from one side of the state to the other, between two major cities. It passed by a large margin, but the Governor used a little known part of the state constitions to overturn the result of the referendum